Tag Archive | 1961

The Wizard of Oz

Striking terror into the souls of young children since 1939

August 15, 2017

A Tuesday Newsday Classic Updated

Good advice…

 “I’d turn back if I were you!” – the message printed on the sign of the Haunted Forest in the classic film “The Wizard of Oz” – was, in my opinion, a wise suggestion. More on that in a bit.

It was August 15, 1939 when “The Wizard of Oz” premiered and, despite costing more to produce than it took in during its theatre run, has become a beloved American classic. In fact, it was named by the American Film Institute as the number one fantasy film ever made.

Nominated for six Academy Awards it lost out to “Gone With The Wind” for best picture. It did win two other awards, however, including best song for the instantly recognizable “Over The Rainbow” and for the best Musical score.

One of the iconic scenes from the film “Over The Rainbow.”

The film was heralded from the very beginning. From the Infallible Wikipedia:

“The film received much acclaim upon its release. Frank Nugent considered the film a ‘delightful piece of wonder-working which had the youngsters’ eyes shining and brought a quietly amused gleam to the wiser ones of the oldsters. Not since Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs has anything quite so fantastic succeeded half so well.’ Nugent had issues with some of the film’s special effects, writing, ‘with the best of will and ingenuity, they cannot make a Munchkin or a Flying Monkey that will not still suggest, however vaguely, a Singer’s Midget in a Jack Dawn masquerade. Nor can they, without a few betraying jolts and split-screen overlappings, bring down from the sky the great soap bubble in which Glinda rides and roll it smoothly into place.’ According to Nugent, ‘Judy Garland’s Dorothy is a pert and fresh-faced miss with the wonder-lit eyes of a believer in fairy tales, but the Baum fantasy is at its best when the Scarecrow, the Tin Man, and the Lion are on the move.’”

One of my earliest memories is when the film was broadcast just once a year on TV. My family lived in Clarkston, Washington the year I was four and it may have been the first year we had a TV in the house.

While my memories from that young age are limited, I do know that my dad made popcorn and that watching the movie was a highly anticipated and exciting family event. Some of the rest of the activities of that day are fuzzy but it was talked about in subsequent years. Having a TV in your home in 1961was a big deal. In fact, in 1954 about 55 percent of households had a TV. In 1962 that number jumped to 90 percent. So my thinking that it was the early 1960’s when our family got our first television is likely accurate.

“Now Fly! Fly! Fly!

But not every family had a television including one set of our neighbors. The day of “The Wizard of Oz” showing, the two oldest daughters of that family showed up at our door with hopes of getting to watch the film. My dad, however, had to turn them away as their parents did not approve of TV and they were not allowed to watch TV. Ever. I know my dad always felt bad about that since he would have welcomed all the neighborhood kids in to watch.

But back to four year old me. I was enthralled by the story of a farm girl who gets carried away by a tornado eventually landing in a magical world. Everything went pretty well right up to the point that Dorothy and her entourage enter the Haunted Forest and they encounter the sign which advises, “I’d turn back if I were you.” When, a minute and a half later, the Wicked Witch of the West is standing silhouette in her castle window and screaming “Fly! Fly! Fly!” to her army of flying monkeys I took that advice.

I was so afraid I left the room and didn’t return for the rest of the movie! Of course I did eventually see the entire film many, many times and loved our family’s annual tradition to watch it. I even shared it with my own children despite my fear that they, too, would be traumatized.

Even now, watching the clip of that scene evokes memories of my childhood terror. As a general rule I will not watch Horror* movies… in fact when the movie “Alien” was shown on TV in the early 1980’s, the scene where the Alien is stalking its victims sent me scurrying to the kitchen to make popcorn for those watching. But I never returned. Some things never change.

I’m off to see the wizard!

The whole story of how the movie was made is a good read. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wizard_of_Oz_(1939_film)

*Some folks claim ‘Alien’ is a Sci-Fi film… but when one does a search of the Best Horror films, it’s on the list.

Happy Birthday Ken!

A case of Kenvy

March 13, 2018

Her introduction in March 1959 sent shockwaves through the toy world and resulted in a nearly complete abandonment of a name which had been in the top 10 for popularity for four decades. The Barbie Doll truly had that impact.

Ken dollLittle girls everywhere loved Barbie. What wasn’t to like? She was pretty, had a great wardrobe, and was the perfect size for small hands. But there was something missing. That something arrived in mid-March 1961: Ken.

Now Barbie had a boyfriend! Ken was every parent’s dream guy for their daughter. He was clean cut, handsome, had hands and arms which were stiff and straight, and a head which could only turn left and right, and was missing guy parts. Then, in 1977, Ken got a celebrity makeover. Gone was the military haircut and the square-jawed face. His new look featured longer hair, dimpled chin, bent arms, a head that swiveled, jewelry and – the most important thing of all – permanent underwear.

He and Barbie were a ‘couple’ until 2004 when Mattel announced their breakup. From the infallible Wikipedia:

“In February, 2004, Mattel announced a split for Ken and Barbie, with Russell Arons, vice president of marketing at Mattel, saying that Barbie and Ken ‘feel it’s time to spend some quality time – apart…Like other celebrity couples, their Hollywood romance has come to an end’, though Arons indicated that the duo would ‘remain friends’. He also hinted that the separation might be partially due to Ken’s reluctance to getting married. In February, 2006 however, a revamped version of the Ken doll was launched, though it was stated that their relationship is still purely platonic. In 2011, Mattel launched a massive campaign for Ken to win Barbie’s affections back. The pair officially reunited in Valentine’s Day 2011.”

Barbie solo in the spotlight.jpgI got my first Barbie Doll for Christmas 1961. Her wardrobe consisted of a bathing suit, a short gold dress, a black evening gown (Solo in the Spotlight!) and a wedding dress. Based on how those clothes ‘survived’ the years I must have played with that doll a lot. The wedding dress, particularly, is mostly a rag but I still have it.

Yet,  I never got the one thing I really wanted for my Barbie which was a Ken.

Three houses down the street from me lived a little girl named Martha. As the youngest – by nearly 10 years – of three girls, it seemed as if Martha had everything. Her Barbie wore the best clothes, relaxed in really cute wicker furniture and, most important, she had a Ken.  I liked going to Martha’s house – despite the fact she was three years younger than me – because of her great Barbie collection.

But I was never allowed to play with her Ken. He was sacrosanct. And I had Kenvy.

Queen of the Prom game.jpgThe closest I ever got to having a Ken was when I played the game “Barbie, Queen of the Prom.” In that game you had to navigate the board to collect a prom dress, appropriate accessories and, most important, a date. There were four choices: Ken, Allan, Tom and Poindexter. No one ever wanted Poindexter. Probably because he looked like he was about twelve.  By the time I was playing that game, it was the mid-1960’s and Ken’s military crew cut was going out of style. No, the desirable date for Queen of the Prom was Allan, a freckled face red head with a winning smile.Queen of the Prom dates

Eventually I got over my Kenvy. Probably when I had a daughter of my own who also LOVED her Barbie dolls (she had dozens, I only ever had two) and who also had a couple of Ken dolls. She played with her dolls for hours but I was most amused by the Ken and Barbie interaction. Whichever Barbie was the favored doll got the Ken. It was that simple. The pair would go on dates and, often, I would see them ‘kissing’ each other as my daughter’s imagination created romantic scenarios. On occasion I would sit on the floor and play Barbie’s with her. But I was never allowed to play with the Ken’s. Some things never change. Okay, so maybe I still have Kenvy.

For more information about Ken click on this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_(doll)

Because there was so much to talk about JUST with Ken, I will be discussing name etymology next week and the cultural impact Barbie and Ken have had over the past 58 years.